The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1206 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Jeremy Balfour
We asked the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities to give evidence, but it has not submitted evidence to us. Obviously, many people go through local authorities. I put this question to Louise and Kyle, although others can come in. In your experience, are local authorities taking digital first too far in relation to older disabled people or older people in general? A lot of services and information are found through local authorities. Do you have any experiences of digital first there?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning, and thank you for coming along. I was interested to read that 49 per cent of pension-age disability payment applications are made online, compared with 91 per cent of Scottish child payment applications. What is the link between pensioner poverty and the digital by default approach? Is that a fairly large issue in Scotland?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Jeremy Balfour
That is helpful. I wonder whether I can dig a wee bit deeper. It was interesting to read that 69 per cent of disabled people aged 60 and over will use the internet, compared to 83 per cent of non-disabled people aged 60 and over. Do you think that older people with disabilities are being left behind more than other older people? How do we address that particular group of individuals?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Jillian, in your report, you say that the most affected people are people in poverty, older people and disabled people. Based on your report and your thinking, are there different things that we need to do for disabled older people compared to older people in general?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 6 March 2025
Jeremy Balfour
That is interesting.
My final question is on the child disability payment. You are right to say that there seems to be an increase in child disability payment expenditure across the whole of the UK, but there seems to be a larger increase in Scotland percentage-wise. Have you or Social Security Scotland done any analysis to find out why that is happening? Is it to do with the people who are applying? Is it to do with people in Scotland having health conditions that are not found in other parts of the UK? Is it to do with the way in which people are being assessed? Has any work been done in relation to that particular benefit?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 6 March 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning, cabinet secretary. Again, for the record, I point out that I receive adult disability payment.
I will follow on from Mr MacDonald’s question about the direction that the Scottish Government might take, if, as we have read, fairly major cuts to social security are likely to be announced at Westminster. Obviously, with regard to this year’s winter fuel payment, you had to go along with what the UK Government did and follow suit. If a change were announced at Westminster to benefits such as the personal independence payment, would the Scottish Government have to mirror that in this financial year, or is there any way that that could be mitigated so that it would not have to be passed on in Scotland?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 6 March 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Like Liz Smith, I welcome the instruments that we are considering today and will vote for them.
I understand that the money is a social investment in Scotland, as you have said on a number of occasions, but that investment comes with a cost that has to be met in the Scottish budget. You will have seen the forecasts for 2026, 2027 and 2028, which are figures of more than ÂŁ1 billion. I presume that that money will have to come from other budgets, so what work are you doing with your colleagues in that regard? Which budgets are you looking at taking that money from, so that that social investment in social security can be made? I do not think that there would be any other way of finding the money, except by raising taxes. Would you raise taxes, or would you take money from other budgets?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I will push you a wee bit on that. You might have heard this morning’s evidence from a GP, who said that she had spoken to colleagues who were unaware of some of what she was talking about. At a strategic level, who do we hold responsible for that? You said that things are different from what they were two or three years ago, but if some medical professionals are still not aware of certain routes and information, there must be gaps. I am not sure whether responsibility for that falls to the health boards or to you. How do we ensure that there is joined-up thinking between statutory bodies, non-statutory bodies, local government, national Government and the NHS?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning, cabinet secretary, and good morning to your team. You will have seen that, in its collective statement, the people’s panel says:
“the same conversations keep happening, with the same actions being agreed but not enough has been implemented.”
We heard earlier from a couple of witnesses that the reality on the ground is not meeting the policy. Across Scotland, there is a very mixed approach, depending on where you live—there seems to be a postcode lottery. Strategically, how do we pull this together? What is the Scottish Government’s view? Do you agree that there is not enough action at grass-roots level?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning. Thank you for coming along and sharing your experience. In your collective statement, you said that there needs to be
“a cultural change across Scotland and the Scottish Government must be brave and bold”
Could you unpack that a wee bit more? What do you mean by “brave and bold”?