The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1101 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Liam Kerr
I will direct two questions to Dr Kerr but, if anyone else wants to come in after he has answered, they should just indicate that.
Dr Kerr talked about heat networks and policy 11. That policy appears to prioritise heat networks—or what people might know as domestic heating—over other technologies. There is a presumption against domestic biomass where heat networks are available. Does that strike the right balance between heating technologies and site-specific solutions? Does it sufficiently recognise other solutions for heating that might be more financially viable or, indeed, practical?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Liam Kerr
Good morning, cabinet secretary. I have several quick questions about data and measurement. How do you measure how far towards the 2030 climate goals the spending decisions in the 2022-23 budget will take Scotland?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Liam Kerr
I want to pick up on something that the cabinet secretary said earlier when he was asked about the heat in buildings strategy and the figure of ÂŁ1.8 billion by 2026. The capital spending review states that the Government will invest ÂŁ1.6 billion to decarbonise heat in buildings. Why is there that difference? In any event, which portfolios will get the money? Can the committee have a detailed breakdown of the proposed spending profile to 2026?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Liam Kerr
I am not sure that that answers my question, minister, because there will obviously be a scheme cost to the public purse to set it up. Perhaps you can come back on that if you are aware of such costs and they have been sorted out.
Secondly, has the Government strategised any scheme to allow smaller businesses to attract and retain customers in a similar manner to the big supermarkets, which presumably can incentivise customers through their loyalty schemes?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Liam Kerr
The ambition is not being delivered, and the minister has not answered the questions that were posed by Maurice Golden in particular. I abstain.
For
Natalie Don (Renfrewshire North and West) (SNP)
Jackie Dunbar (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
Fiona Hyslop (Linlithgow) (SNP)
Mark Ruskell (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Against
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Abstentions
Liam Kerr (North East Scotland) (Con)
Dean Lockhart (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Liam Kerr
I am grateful for that response. Does Jeremy Lawson wish to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Liam Kerr
I understand. Thank you very much. Back to you, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Liam Kerr
I shall be brief. Should SNIB be investing in listed managed funds? Tracy Black mentioned the city deals in her opening responses. As a partnership and funding model, will they deliver low carbon infrastructure?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Liam Kerr
I was not going to speak but, having listened to the minister’s evidence sessions today and previously, I feel compelled to do so.
My friend Monica Lennon spoke rather well just now, and she made some really important points.
The regulations have been half a decade in gestation, and we are now being told that they will be delayed again. The minister blames several extraneous factors. That is rather difficult to square with the reality. Our friends elsewhere are striding on with schemes that are constructed differently and which, evidence suggests, might be effective and future proofed. That relates to my earlier question.
The minister has rather struggled to answer several direct questions from across the political spectrum, and the answers that have been given have lacked detail. As Monica Lennon rightly said, we are all, across the parties, keen to see a workable, effective and successful scheme as soon as possible. The minister has talked positively about what a scheme can achieve and its benefits, but I am very concerned that its detail, depth and finances remain opaque.
This is a debate. I respectfully request that, in closing, the minister gives clear details of commitments and figures on the funds and the likely cost to the public purse, which I asked about, in order to allay my and possibly others’ significant concerns about what is proposed.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Liam Kerr
It does, up to a point.
I have one more question, minister. As you will be well aware, other jurisdictions are trialling a digital DRS system, which—certainly according to the research that I have done—would be cheaper, have a lower carbon footprint and be easier for people to get involved with. That begs a question: has the Scottish Government conducted, or will it conduct, a business case and feasibility study for a digital DRS? Will businesses that have set up your DRS be compensated—and if so, by whom—for what would presumably be an obsolete outlay if a digital DRS is ultimately introduced in Scotland?