The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 936 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Rona Mackay
My arithmetic is not great but, of the further 10 cases,
“2 have proceeded, one was deserted and 3 were converted to a physical trial.â€
That leaves four. What happened to them?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Rona Mackay
That would be useful—thank you.
I have just one more question; I know that other members have questions. It is about remote attendance by vulnerable witnesses in criminal cases. How does the system that is used now compare with what happened before the pandemic? We heard from Victim Support Scotland and Women’s Aid that witnesses find remote attendance a lot less intimidating, because it means that there is no face-to-face contact with alleged perpetrators, and that they are very much in favour of it. What are your thoughts on how the process has changed?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Rona Mackay
Good morning. Cabinet secretary, you will be aware that we have heard support for, and concerns about, the greater use of virtual options—there are mixed views on the subject. Some of those concerns are around the fact that it can prevent effective communication between legal representatives and their clients, impede the assessment of the credibility of witnesses and discriminate against people who do not have access to digital technology. What are your thoughts on that? Are those concerns being addressed?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Rona Mackay
Do you see it as a problem that concerns are being expressed by one side of the legal profession as opposed to the other? We have heard quite opposing views. Is it possible to bridge the gap between the views of defence lawyers, with their traditional practices, and people in the court service who think that the approach gives them a useful tool to clear the backlog and address the needs of domestic abuse victims and vulnerable witnesses, which is very much favoured by third sector organisations?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Rona Mackay
I will ask a couple of questions about virtual trials, although my colleagues have more.
I thank you for your helpful letter, Mr Fraser. I have a few questions arising from it. On the Aberdeen domestic abuse pilots, you say that
“at the start of January 2022 a further 10 cases were scheduled for trial of which 2 have proceeded, one was deserted and 3 were converted to a physical trial.â€
What were the reasons for converting those cases to physical trials?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Rona Mackay
Who makes the decision to convert?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Rona Mackay
I just want to get a general understanding of how the process works. Did that pilot go according to plan, as it were? Was it successful?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Rona Mackay
Do you see that continuing?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Rona Mackay
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Rona Mackay
My questions were very much along the same lines as those that Katy Clark asked on purposeful activity and exercise, and the cabinet secretary has answered most of them. However, I note that the briefing from Teresa Medhurst shows the differences between the prison estates, and they seem to relate to staff and staff absences. Perhaps Mr Purdie can confirm that on the record. Secondly, has any thought been given to drafting in retired prison officers to cover situations temporarily so that more activity can be done?