The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1063 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
That is a good question. I will defer to officials, as I have not been through the consultation responses in detail. Does Jill Clark want to pick that up?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
Has that not come forward?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
The keeper will be watching that as part of her on-going business and engagement with ministers. The same would apply to the whole range of fees that ROS charges for various services. I do not think that there is any specific trigger for a review, but there would be a process鈥攁nnually, I think鈥攚hereby there would be the opportunity to engage on that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
That is a good point. The best plan is for us to take that away and reflect on it, and then come back to you. As I said, when individuals were taken out of the scope of the bill, the sense was that there was no requirement for that, because the vast bulk of money advice agencies would be operating on behalf of individuals. However, you are right that a sole trader could find themselves in that position. I will go and check what that situation looks like at the moment. I do not know whether we have got any data on how many searches we might expect money advice organisations to undertake, but I suspect that it would not be a big number in the grand scheme of things. We will reflect on that, engage with the keeper and respond to the committee.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
There is provision for that to be done. I suppose that your question is why people would do that. People on both sides of the transaction have an interest in keeping the registers up to date, as they reflect their commercial reality. Does anyone else want to comment?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
Putting that information up is a necessary part of the process, is it not? The whole point is to make that information visible.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
The question is whether there is an onus on the registers to verify information that they are presented with. Indeed, it is not even information that is the issue, because the information will be accurate; it is the intent behind the information. I suppose that the answer to that is that the register can only check what is in front of it.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
The information might also be commercially sensitive. I assume that we do not put every invoice on to the register.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
That is a good point. The registers would make that information easily available for anyone who chose to search for it. You are absolutely right that raising awareness of the change is important.
Jill, would you like to comment on what we have done specifically in that regard?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
That is a very good point, and you are right. Engaging with the profession is one thing, but, as you say, in many cases, legal support would not be engaged in those transactions. I am happy to take that away to look at how we can raise awareness more comprehensively through business organisations and at how we can raise the profile more generally.