The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2528 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
John Mason
Does Stephen Kerr accept that, although it is very easy to say that there is a problem—and we might all accept that there is—there is not a neat solution? Does he accept that, whatever we do in this situation, it will not be perfect? It might be a little better or worse than what we have at the moment, but there is no neat and tidy solution that ticks all the boxes.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
John Mason
As the member has pointed out, everyone must have confidence in whatever we end up with. None of the suggestions today is perfect—that is agreed—but they are not even good enough to give confidence to everybody. Does he agree that we are not yet at the stage of agreeing on one of the options?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
John Mason
Setting up a completely new body flies in the face of where Parliament seems to be going. The Finance and Public Administration Committee is especially keen on not setting up completely new bodies, as there is a considerable cost to that. Scotland is a small country, and we should surely be able to do things in a more simple way and have fewer public bodies rather than increase their number.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
John Mason
The member gives different examples, but we also have good examples in the form of His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland and His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons for Scotland. Those are not legally separate organisations, but they are respected for their independence. Would he accept that it is possible, within one organisation, to have a degree of independence? A lot depends not on what is in the legislation but, as I think that we found with the SQA, on the people who are involved. If they perform, the system will work; if they do not, the system will not work.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
John Mason
You are on “Good Morning Scotland” a few times a week.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
John Mason
I might come back to you on that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
John Mason
Professor Bell, do you want to come in again?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
John Mason
Would health also be partly demand led?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
John Mason
Both of you gave helpful answers. You deal with different audiences—you have specialised people who know everything from back to front and you have the public, while ˿ and MPs are probably somewhere in the middle. The SFC has also been grappling with that and is trying to communicate more with the wider public.
The convener asked you about the word “transparency”. In one sense, the more data you produce, the more transparent the position might become for the experts, but is there a danger that that would make it less transparent and more complex for the ordinary person on the street?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
John Mason
You mentioned making a central forecast and that you are also trying to point out the risks and the variations that there could be. With tariffs, we really do not know what will happen. Things might get worse or they might get better. Also, there might be a trade deal. Do you think that that is well understood? Presumably, experts who read your reports get that, but does the wider population understand that, when you are making a forecast, that forecast is in the middle of a range of possibilities?