The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4776 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Edward Mountain
I am trying to understand something before we leave this subject. We have fewer trains, but the public performance measure was at a lower level last year than it was when that was given as the reason for the nationalisation of ScotRail. So that I can square that loop, can you explain why, even with fewer trains, we still cannot get the public performance measure up to where it was before nationalisation?
Kevin Lindsay, you are smiling, so you must have the answer. Do you want to have a go at that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Edward Mountain
We can go into that another time.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Edward Mountain
It seems odd that we allow it on the sleeper train from Inverness, which is run by ScotRail. I do not know why we allow it there and not on other trains.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Edward Mountain
You do, provided that it does not relate to a subject area that affects only your constituency.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Edward Mountain
In fairness, this is a relaying of the original instrument and we had some indication of those matters during the previous briefing. It might have been helpful if that had been reiterated, but it was done in the first instance, although something might have been lost in translation.
As no other member wishes to comment, I invite the committee to agree that it does not wish to make any recommendations in relation to the instrument.
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Edward Mountain
Was any comment made about the quality of the bus stops in rural areas? Some of them seem to face into the prevailing wind and rain. That does not work for me, but I wonder whether you have any comments on that.
09:30Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you. The next questions come from Mark Ruskell.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Edward Mountain
Our second item of business is consideration of two Scottish statutory instruments. As both have been laid under the negative procedure, they will come into force unless the Parliament agrees to a motion to annul them, and no motions to annul have been lodged.
I will be seeking views on each instrument in turn. However, before I do so鈥攁nd this was very rude of me鈥擨 should have acknowledged the fact that Monica Lennon has been unable to attend the meeting, and that Sarah Boyack is attending as her substitute.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Edward Mountain
The first instrument鈥擲SI 2025/78鈥攔evokes and replaces identical regulations that we considered on 11 March. The new instrument has been made because of what the Government considers was an error in its handling of the consultation responses, which it has sought to correct.
The Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee has drawn the instrument to the Parliament鈥檚 attention, because it did not meet the requirement to be laid 28 days before coming into force. In this case, the instrument was laid on 18 March but partly came into force on 30 March. When an instrument breaches the 28-day rule, the Scottish Government is required to provide an explanation, which is provided in annex B to the clerk鈥檚 note.
Does any member wish to make any comments on the instrument? I find it odd that there were only three responses to the consultation and that one of them was totally ignored. It also seems odd that we are having to come back and do this again, which is, I think, not something that I have ever come across before.
Sarah, did you want to comment?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Edward Mountain
I think that most of us would join you in those thoughts.
Douglas, we have about eight minutes left for this session. Will you ask your two questions, so that I can bring in Sue Webber at the end if she wants to ask a question?