The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1370 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Clare Adamson
Mr Adam, did you want to come in?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Clare Adamson
Thank you very much, cabinet secretary. The UK internal market white paper stated that the principles constitute
“a legislative framework that will preserve the fundamental market access rights of business and citizens across the UK Internal Market”,
and that the system
“will replace the effect of the rules and mechanisms of the EU Single Market ... within the UK.”
What is your assessment of the extent to which UKIMA has replaced the rules and mechanisms of the European Union single market?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Clare Adamson
Mr Kerr, we have now covered half an hour of our allotted time, and the cabinet secretary is short of time. I will bring you back in if time allows but will bring in some other members.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Clare Adamson
Good morning, and a warm welcome to the 12th meeting in 2025 of the Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee. We have received apologies from Keith Brown and Alexander Stewart.
The only item on this week’s agenda is to take evidence for the final time as part of our inquiry to feed into the consultation for the UK Government’s review of the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020.
Before we begin, I should state that there is an active court case that is relevant to the committee’s inquiry—Biffa Waste Services Ltd v the Scottish ministers. Given that the case is active, we have sought the Presiding Officer’s permission to be able to refer to the deposit return scheme exclusion process today. The Presiding Officer has permitted discussion of the policy issues in order to enable scrutiny, while indicating that we should avoid direct comment on the specifics of the case. Any reference to the matter should be made within those parameters, and direct discussion of the court case is to be avoided.
I welcome Angus Robertson, the Cabinet Secretary for Constitution, External Affairs and Culture, and Euan Page, head of UK frameworks, Scottish Government. I thank the cabinet secretary for his letter earlier this week and for sight of the Scottish Government’s response to the UK Government’s review.
I invite the cabinet secretary to make a short opening statement.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Clare Adamson
I have one more question. You mentioned our 2022 report on the UK internal market, in which we recognised that
“Common Frameworks ... have the potential to resolve the tensions within the devolved settlement through managing regulatory divergence on a consensual basis while facilitating open trade”.
Is there any evidence that that potential can be realised? Is there really an opportunity to improve how the act works in relation to common frameworks as part of that review?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Clare Adamson
I have a couple more questions. The theme of a lot of the evidence that we have heard from business is that it wants to know what the pathway is, what the regulations will be and to have certainty, which is good for all business. Until very recently—that is, until Brexit—the conventions of devolution were, by and large, respected by both Governments.
09:45I go back to the evidence that we have taken on the Sewel convention and the strain that it has been under since that time. Given that we have moved from that way forward to the internal market act and that the position of “not normally legislate” has changed over the course of devolution, do we need to rely on more than just the convention and the relationships between the two Governments to ensure a way forward? How would you achieve such an aim?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Clare Adamson
Thank you, cabinet secretary. We move to questions from committee members, and the first question is from Stephen Kerr.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Clare Adamson
From my experience of dealing with the Scottish people, the devolved issues that they are interested in are health issues, environmental issues, animal welfare issues and so on. However, we have heard evidence of a “chilling effect”. In the current system, do you see a way to ensure that the lowest common denominator of regulation will not trump all the options that the devolution settlement has given Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Clare Adamson
We have also taken evidence from the office for the internal market, which was necessarily set up as a result of UKIMA. In the evidence, we heard that the office is able to offer advice to businesses and to Governments when that is requested, although it cannot compel parties to take such advice on board. Is there space for an arbitrator with more powers to intervene when a deadlock situation happens, in order to fairly represent each Government’s position?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Clare Adamson
No one wants the opportunity to ask a final question, so that concludes our session, cabinet secretary. I thank you for your attendance.
Meeting closed at 09:53.