The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1067 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Liz Smith
I will stay on the same theme, Professor Heald. It is an interesting debate whether, from a philosophical angle, devolved and reserved matters should remain separate or whether there is an economic case to have a slight blurring to boost expenditure. In paragraph 10 of your submission, you say that such a blurring can affect transparency because it is not so easy to see where the money is being spent and, more importantly, how well it is being used. You mention “blame shifting” or “credit claiming” and say that it becomes too much of a political matter. Is there a philosophical argument for keeping reserved and devolved matters entirely separate?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Liz Smith
I would echo the comments of the convener, that it is extremely helpful to have this additional information that we have not had on previous occasions. I also thank you, minister, for the letter that you sent me on 16 November 2021, when I asked various questions regarding the autumn budget revisions, particularly on the education front.
I will stay on the education theme for a minute. One of my colleagues wants to ask you about this in a bit more depth, too. Could you interrogate the figure for student loans? It seems to be pretty high.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Liz Smith
Are those Covid-related changes? Obviously, there may be more students who are—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Liz Smith
That is correct, so can we take this a little bit further? In a Covid scenario, when we obviously want to increase the amount of money that is available to Scotland in order to get ourselves back on our feet—there has been additional money, which has been drawn from reserves—is it your view that the process of applying that spending has great difficulties if it is at the behest of the UK Government acting on behalf of Scotland rather than being held and disbursed by the Scottish Government?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Liz Smith
And of this committee.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Liz Smith
It would be helpful to the committee if we could get a little detail. As you say, it is obviously very technical. I am sure that Michelle Thomson wants to come in on that.
I have another couple of questions, Michelle, so if you want to come in on that bit—it is up to the convener.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Liz Smith
Mr Mackay is quite right—the matter is exceptionally technical. I am interested in the prediction that it will be more difficult in the years ahead to draw back as much money on student loans, because more people have gone through great difficulties after Covid. Is that really what you are saying?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Liz Smith
I understand that, but that aspect is very important because it has an effect on the numbers of students. We are trying to widen access, which we have made good progress on, so it has a big implication for future spending.
Minister, I want to ask you about your helpful table towards the end of your brief about the differences between the Covid and non-Covid spend on education. We had Alastair Sim at committee last week, who made the point that he is concerned that higher education is not sufficiently high up the Scottish Government’s list of priorities when it comes to future spend. The figure for higher education student support in that table is £15 million. I have asked about that before, but I ask again: specifically, what is that figure for?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Liz Smith
The broader point, minister, is that we can agree or disagree with Mr Sim about the future spend on higher education, but a serious issue has been presented to the committee from a lot of witnesses, which is that higher education really matters for the skills that we need if we are to address some of the problems in the economy. What is very helpful about the information that you have provided is that we have a better breakdown of that spending. I am interested in things such as student support, because that is an important aspect of encouraging younger people into higher education.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Liz Smith
Thank you.