The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1067 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Liz Smith
I want to turn your attention to the client experience of disability benefits. Quoting the “Measuring Our Charter” results, the excellent SPICe briefing, to which you have already referred, says that
“those in receipt of ADP and CDP were much less likely to say”
that
“they got”
sufficient
“updates, that the application”
process
“was easy to understand”,
that they answered relevant questions as part of it, and that the application was
“processed within a reasonable time.”
We have been over that last point, but I want to focus on the application process itself. In the current budget, £450 million is being spent on child disability benefit, and that figure is projected to go up to £618 million in the next budget, an increase of 37 per cent. Why is there such an increase when, as it says in our papers, people are finding the application process quite difficult?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Liz Smith
I am sorry to interrupt, but are you talking about May 2024?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Liz Smith
I just want to interrogate that further. Are you saying that the reason for the very substantial increase in the amount of money that is having to be disbursed to those receiving, in this case, child disability payment is that the process is much longer and more problematic, as you have just described, or is it that far more families with children are making the application? That is an important distinction when we look at the policy’s effectiveness.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Liz Smith
Does the same principle not apply to adult disability payment? The Scottish Government has been clear that the same principles are supposed to apply for both disability benefits. Your answer does not explain the huge difference between the 11 per cent and 37 per cent increases.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Liz Smith
Generally speaking, there is good cross-party agreement on the principles. The real issue is deciding how effective payments are and addressing the specific problems that have manifested in the welfare system.
The Scottish Government has made its views known strongly, for good reasons or bad reasons, about the mitigation of the two-child cap—that is not new, and it has been on-going for some time. Why did you decide to introduce mitigation for the two-child cap now, which did not meet the Scottish Fiscal Commission’s deadline for working on the budget? Why did the SFC have to come back last week to say that its projections were for £155 million in 2026-27, which would increase to £198 million in 2029-30?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Liz Smith
Yes, and in the foreseeable future, because the Scottish Fiscal Commission has provided forecasts right up to 2029-30.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Liz Smith
Have you been able to work out the increase in those costs? Obviously, Parliament cannot do anything about them—we have to accept them, as those are the market prices for office accommodation and hotel accommodation. Has a percentage increase been built into projections for future budgets?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Liz Smith
I will turn our attention to social security budgets. The child disability payment budget is £450 million at the moment, and the costs are to go up to £618 million in 2025-26, which is an increase of 37 per cent. Will you outline why there is such an extensive increase in that budget?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Liz Smith
I will finish with the direct question that I asked your colleague Shirley-Anne Somerville last Thursday. The Scottish Government is arguing that its policy choices are about investment, and I presume that the return on that investment will be due not in the forthcoming budget but in years ahead. Where is the money coming from to fund the substantial increase in social security?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Liz Smith
Where is the money coming from? I accept that it is about priorities, with which I might disagree, but where is the money coming from to fund the immediate considerable uplift?