The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1067 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Liz Smith
Forgive me, but the Scottish Government has already made its choices. Michael Marra asked you when we would get an options paper. The key point here, which I have already questioned you and Shirley-Anne Somerville on in the Social Justice and Social Security Committee, is that, if there is evidence that proves that various social security policies would provide better outcomes than other policies when it comes to child poverty, surely it is the duty of the Scottish Government to provide that evidence, in line with the questions that the committee is asking. For example, what specific evidence have you found to show that the delivery of mitigation of the two-child cap would provide better outcomes than, say, an increase in the Scottish child payment? Where is that evidence?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Liz Smith
Let us assume that action on child poverty is the number 1 priority for the Scottish Government鈥攚hich, as I understand it, it is. Given the state of the public finances, particularly with the considerable uplift in the social security budget鈥攊t is a huge increase, especially in a single budget鈥攚e cannot afford all the commitments that the Scottish Government has made without finding an awful lot of extra money.
There are two parts to my question. First, where is that extra money coming from? Secondly, on what basis is the Scottish Government making decisions on where the outcomes will be best when it comes to the delivery of social security?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Liz Smith
Cabinet secretary, I want to pursue our dialogue about social security spend. At your most recent appearance before the committee, you made various commitments. I will start with one that you made to Michael Marra when he asked you, in relation to the various aspects of the two-child cap mitigation,
鈥淲ill you write to the committee with information on the options appraisal that you carried out, setting out why you chose that option in preference to some of the others?鈥濃擺Official Report, Finance and Public Administration Committee, 14 January 2025; c 43.]
What has happened to that commitment?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Liz Smith
I will push you on that, because I think that it is very important that we see that evidence.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Liz Smith
I am not questioning the decisions or the criteria that you have set out鈥攖here is just a bit of a contradiction here. The process is supposed to be much more user friendly and much easier; at the same time, however, your own survey is saying that people in receipt of adult disability and child disability payments are not finding it particularly easy, compared with the process for other benefits. Can you explain why that is?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Liz Smith
Thank you.
There are no more questions from me, convener, but I would just go back to the point that Mr Balfour made earlier. When it comes to our deciding on best policy, what do you think are the benefits that are working most effectively to deliver on the ambition that you have set out? It is important that we get the right data and that we can use good quantitative as well as qualitative measurements of what is most effective. That was my final point.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Liz Smith
I understand that, but that said, there must be a reason for such an increase in the number of people making an application.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Liz Smith
I am just trying to get to the answer to this mystery.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Liz Smith
Okay.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Liz Smith
That was helpful. Do you know from your discussions with the DWP whether it is having similar problems with the application process?