The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1067 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Liz Smith
Minister, I do not have any issues with the order that you have set out. However, it raises issues that we have been wrestling with in the committee for a long time, and our predecessor committee—the Finance and Constitution Committee—in the previous session of Parliament was doing exactly the same. We are all struggling to get a handle on what the criteria are for measuring public sector reform.
I have heard you and Shona Robison say in the chamber several times that there has been quite a lot of improvement in the efficiency of public services. It is not easy to see that, and I think that you would probably agree. Do you have any way of helping the committee to know what criteria we should be looking for to see how well we are advancing with public sector reform?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Liz Smith
It is a big question, because we are responsible for scrutinising public money. If aspects of public sector reform are working particularly well in saving public money and delivering better outcomes, it is important to the Parliament and the committee to demonstrate that. I am interested in how Scottish ministers or civil servants can provide some of the data that we need to scrutinise that a bit more, because, if we could do that, it could go a long way towards improving how the Parliament works and giving the public some confidence that public sector reform is working.
11:15Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Liz Smith
When is that data—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Liz Smith
You said that an update was coming.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Liz Smith
Before I ask my main questions, I will go back to the convener’s questions about data. Do you have any evidence that the fact that your bill is in existence means that the availability of data is improving? It is by no means complete, as you have rightly said—I speak as someone who also has a member’s bill in Parliament and has lacked data to work with. Do you have any evidence that we are getting better data because you are addressing the issues through your bill?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Liz Smith
That sounds positive.
Following your opening remarks, the convener asked you about Dame Carol Black’s comment that every £1 that is spent might get a £4 return due to reduced spending in justice and health services, which is obviously encouraging. Paragraph 94 of your financial memorandum refers to a Public Health Scotland figure from 2009, which put the cost of illicit drug use at £3.5 billion at a time when drug use was less than it is, sadly, today. Drug use is higher now, so the costs will be higher. Do you therefore consider that savings might also be much higher as a result of that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 6 March 2025
Liz Smith
I have a technical question, cabinet secretary. I put on record that I do not have any issues with the instruments, as they are.
A point that has regularly come out at the Finance and Public Administration Committee is the issue of whether the consumer prices index or the retail prices index measure is used, as that obviously has an impact on forecasting. In your discussions with the finance secretary and the Scottish Fiscal Commission, are you trying to get some consistency in relation to the use of those measures, because it obviously matters a lot to the level of payment?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 6 March 2025
Liz Smith
Thank you for the kind comment.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Liz Smith
The “Scottish Government Guide to the Autumn Budget Revision” makes it clear that there is no change in the overall funding situation—that is fine. However, somebody in Perth or Dunfermline might want to know when the reprofiling will happen. Are you able to give us any guidance on that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Liz Smith
Right. I do not think that I have seen that information, and nor have some of my colleagues. If you could provide it, that would be very helpful.
Am I right in thinking that the separate £6 million that the guide highlights relates to very specific projects within some of the deals? Is that correct? I am looking at paragraph 59 of the Scottish Government’s guide, which says that there are
“Separately £6 million of project specific City Deal transfers”.
I presume that, if we take away the £6 million from the £43.7 million, we get the £37.7 million. Is that correct?