The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2149 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you. The project list shows 18 projects in the Ayrshire growth deal. Two of them, we know, have been dropped. There are another 10 that have not drawn down a single penny in five years. That is more than just a problem of two projects having to be dropped; that suggests to me that there is a wider problem.
This is one of the few opportunities that a parliamentary committee gets to scrutinise the growth deals. As you know, we do not have a formal scrutiny role—we are not part of the partnership boards and so on. Do you think that we need to revisit what the scrutiny picture looks like, to give the Parliament, its committees and its members an opportunity to have some involvement in and oversight of progress?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Cabinet secretary, you kindly said that there is still a commitment to the funding if Ayrshire takes the time to redevelop and repurpose some of the project ideas. When I put the same question to Ian Murray three weeks ago, he said:
“There is no threat to that funding at this moment in time.”
We can take from that what we will. However, he also said:
“with every week that passes, the funding becomes smaller, because of inflation”.—[Official Report, Economy and Fair Work Committee, 15 January 2025; c 14.]
Is it reasonable to expect that funding pot to sit unused and untapped for such a prolonged period, with the progress that has been made?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Good morning, Jo Armstrong and colleagues. I have two or three questions.
First, the proposed settlement for this year is £1 billion more than it was last year. That represents a 4.5 per cent increase in cash terms and a 2 per cent increase in real terms. However, if we look back to 2022-23 going into 2023-24, we see that the real-terms allocation to councils went down. Will you give us a flavour of what causes the ebb and flow and the up and down of allocations? Was inflation one of the biggest impacts in relation to that reduction?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Do you not have a figure to hand from the statements that have been made, just to assure the committee?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Willie Coffey
In paragraph 55 of the report, the Accounts Commission talks about the Strathclyde Pension Fund and the windfall that members of that fund have received. However, there are not really any figures about the size of the windfall that each of the fund’s 12 members actually received. To return to the transparency that we were talking about earlier, do those members declare that figure in their own accounts so that we can see what they have made from the fund? Also, I know that they are planning to reduce their contribution over the next few years, which will again save them significant amounts of money. Is that quantified anywhere?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Willie Coffey
That uncertainly does not make the situation easy for councils. They do not know what settlement they will get from year to year, which is why everybody wants multiyear funding agreements.
Jo Armstrong talked about workforce costs. Our colleagues in the Scottish Parliament information centre indicated that between 60 and 70 per cent of local authority budgets can be for pay. Another figure shows that total employment costs have increased by 16 per cent in real terms over the past 10 years. That is clearly having a huge impact on the overall budget that is available to councils, not to mention—although you did mention it—the national insurance issue. Will you give us a flavour of what that continued uncertainty and the cost of workforce wages could mean for local authorities?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Is there a forecast figure for the potential impact of the increase in national insurance contributions?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Is that at the low end or the high end?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Blyth Deans, you talked about the measures that councils are adopting to try to bridge the budget gap by looking for recurring savings and so on. Will you give the committee a flavour of what councils are doing to assist that process?