The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2149 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you very much, both of you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Professor Gibb, have you remembered what you wanted to say?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Unless there are any other comments on the issue of revaluation and progressivity, I will stop there. Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Good morning. My first question is probably for David Phillips. I was interested in your mention of 1991 and the Soviet Union in your opening remarks. I will take you back a few years before that to 1988 and 1989 when the poll tax was introduced in Scotland. As I remember—I campaigned against it—it was a single charge. We could argue that we are where we are because of those origins.
In your submission to the committee, you suggested that council tax discounts and exemptions have distorted the use of residential property and have contributed to overcrowding and underoccupation of property. Could you develop that idea a bit more for the committee and explain the thinking behind that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you. The next question is for both of you. Should councils have some power to set the multipliers between the bands? Should that be a local decision that councils can take? What risks might be associated with that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you, David. Emma, do you want councils to have such powers?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Ken, do you want to enter this battle of the bands?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Willie Coffey
My final question is on AI. You mentioned the AI National Robotarium project in Edinburgh, which is a growth deal project. Allied to that is the exascale computer project, which was not part of the growth deal but is closely aligned to the whole project concept in Edinburgh. We also asked the Secretary of State for Scotland about that three weeks ago. Everyone’s understanding was that that investment was earmarked for Edinburgh, but he told us that, when his Government came into office, there was “no money” behind that project whatsoever. We are talking about £900 million of investment for that supercomputer in Edinburgh.
However, the secretary of state did not tell us that the project has been shifted to Oxford. In the past three weeks, we have discovered that the supercomputer is being built but that it is being built in Oxford. Last week, it was announced that there would be about £78 billion of investment in the Oxford to Cambridge growth corridor, and I presume that that investment will encompass funding for the exascale computer. Have Edinburgh and Scotland been short-changed by those decisions?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Willie Coffey
The convener talked about different models of providing money to areas in the UK. Is the £78 billion of investment, in effect, a new growth deal, but for the Oxford to Cambridge corridor?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Good morning. The Ayrshire growth deal’s annual report that was issued in November shows that there has been a drawdown of only 8 per cent so far on both Governments’ commitments. Of that 8 per cent, 70 per cent is for one project. Does the Scottish Government consider that to be good progress, five years into the programme?