łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content

Language: English /

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 28 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2149 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee

New Deal for Business

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Willie Coffey

Thank you, everybody, for tackling those questions.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

New Deal for Business

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Willie Coffey

I know from what I have read that that has been followed up. From my perspective as a constituency MSP, it is really important to make sure that the money actually reaches the targets that we hope for.

Another funding announcement was that £90 million would be set aside to reduce economic inactivity. The Deputy First Minister spoke directly about that at the business group meeting, but some colleagues noted that 35 per cent of folk coming back into economic activity are falling back out of the labour market reasonably soon after that. There is a whole variety of reasons why—family, social circumstances, travel, costs, equipment, resources and all of that. That makes for a slightly different question: funding is great, but how do we make sure that the people who we bring back into economic activity are able to stay in it? Is there an issue for us to improve on to make sure that we retain people in the market?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

New Deal for Business

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Willie Coffey

What about retaining people? People come into the job market and suddenly fall back out of it for a variety of reasons. How do we tap into what those reasons are to try to make sure that people stay longer?

There are social issues surrounding productive employment, for example. Does the fund help those aspects? I am not sure. Based on your experience, do we need to do more sideways work to assist people to stay in the job market?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

New Deal for Business

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Willie Coffey

Good morning. I want to raise a couple of points that were discussed at the most recent meeting of the new deal for business group—I have in front of me the minutes of the meeting in January. The question is probably more for Sara Thiam and Colin Borland, who are direct members of the group, but I would appreciate views from the other witnesses.

10:45  

In the budget, the Scottish Government announced funding of ÂŁ62 million to support the regeneration of local and small economies by enterprise agencies. Someone at the meeting said that

“most small business members don’t see how this”

funding

“assists them”

at all, either because

“they don’t qualify for rates relief”—

which is a surprise—or because they do not

“fit the client profile of the Enterprise Agencies”.

I invite you to comment on the thinking around that. We are following the public pound here: the Government has announced funding with the purpose of helping small businesses, but members of the new deal for business group are saying that they somehow cannot access that funding. I want to try to understand why that should be and what we can do about it.

Perhaps Sara or Colin could go first.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

New Deal for Business

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Willie Coffey

The issue for me is whether we are choosing the correct model to disburse the money to the small businesses that need it and whether Business Gateway would be a better model, because it is much more closely connected and aligned with constituencies such as mine that do not have the necessary engagement and relationship with enterprise agencies.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Council Tax

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Willie Coffey

That is really helpful. Thank you for expanding on that for members of the committee.

Emma Congreve, when the joint working group consulted on the issue, the Fraser of Allander Institute was sceptical about proposed changes to the higher band multipliers. It said:

“to take forward reforms without a revaluation just rubs salt into the wounds.”

Will you develop that line of thinking for us, please?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Council Tax

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Willie Coffey

My first question is for Joanne Walker. In your submission, you say that

“a property with a value at the lower end of the band generates the same tax charge as a property with a value at the higher end of the band.”

Everybody knows that, but are there any reforms that could overcome that? Would having more bands and smaller differences between bands help to address that?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Council Tax

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Willie Coffey

Thanks. Sara, do you have any comments on the bands debate?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Council Tax

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Willie Coffey

I will move on to the issue of low-income households. How would that group of people benefit from any revaluation scheme that might come into place? I am thinking about pensioner households in particular. If, for the sake of argument, their house is suddenly revalued at double the current value, their income will not change with respect to that, as we all know. Therefore, how would low-income and pensioner household groups benefit from a revaluation scheme, if at all?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Council Tax

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Willie Coffey

Does revaluation mean that the system becomes more progressive, in your opinion?

10:15