The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2149 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you, everybody, for tackling those questions.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Willie Coffey
I know from what I have read that that has been followed up. From my perspective as a constituency MSP, it is really important to make sure that the money actually reaches the targets that we hope for.
Another funding announcement was that £90 million would be set aside to reduce economic inactivity. The Deputy First Minister spoke directly about that at the business group meeting, but some colleagues noted that 35 per cent of folk coming back into economic activity are falling back out of the labour market reasonably soon after that. There is a whole variety of reasons why—family, social circumstances, travel, costs, equipment, resources and all of that. That makes for a slightly different question: funding is great, but how do we make sure that the people who we bring back into economic activity are able to stay in it? Is there an issue for us to improve on to make sure that we retain people in the market?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Willie Coffey
What about retaining people? People come into the job market and suddenly fall back out of it for a variety of reasons. How do we tap into what those reasons are to try to make sure that people stay longer?
There are social issues surrounding productive employment, for example. Does the fund help those aspects? I am not sure. Based on your experience, do we need to do more sideways work to assist people to stay in the job market?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Good morning. I want to raise a couple of points that were discussed at the most recent meeting of the new deal for business group—I have in front of me the minutes of the meeting in January. The question is probably more for Sara Thiam and Colin Borland, who are direct members of the group, but I would appreciate views from the other witnesses.
10:45In the budget, the Scottish Government announced funding of ÂŁ62 million to support the regeneration of local and small economies by enterprise agencies. Someone at the meeting said that
“most small business members don’t see how this”
funding
“assists them”
at all, either because
“they don’t qualify for rates relief”—
which is a surprise—or because they do not
“fit the client profile of the Enterprise Agencies”.
I invite you to comment on the thinking around that. We are following the public pound here: the Government has announced funding with the purpose of helping small businesses, but members of the new deal for business group are saying that they somehow cannot access that funding. I want to try to understand why that should be and what we can do about it.
Perhaps Sara or Colin could go first.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Willie Coffey
The issue for me is whether we are choosing the correct model to disburse the money to the small businesses that need it and whether Business Gateway would be a better model, because it is much more closely connected and aligned with constituencies such as mine that do not have the necessary engagement and relationship with enterprise agencies.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Willie Coffey
That is really helpful. Thank you for expanding on that for members of the committee.
Emma Congreve, when the joint working group consulted on the issue, the Fraser of Allander Institute was sceptical about proposed changes to the higher band multipliers. It said:
“to take forward reforms without a revaluation just rubs salt into the wounds.”
Will you develop that line of thinking for us, please?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Willie Coffey
My first question is for Joanne Walker. In your submission, you say that
“a property with a value at the lower end of the band generates the same tax charge as a property with a value at the higher end of the band.”
Everybody knows that, but are there any reforms that could overcome that? Would having more bands and smaller differences between bands help to address that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Thanks. Sara, do you have any comments on the bands debate?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Willie Coffey
I will move on to the issue of low-income households. How would that group of people benefit from any revaluation scheme that might come into place? I am thinking about pensioner households in particular. If, for the sake of argument, their house is suddenly revalued at double the current value, their income will not change with respect to that, as we all know. Therefore, how would low-income and pensioner household groups benefit from a revaluation scheme, if at all?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Does revaluation mean that the system becomes more progressive, in your opinion?
10:15