The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1229 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I have no interests to declare.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
It did. Thank you.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Tom, you have been nodding away.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I want to make a point on the Jeremy Hunt situation. A huge effort has always been made in Scotland, particularly by Governments, to make sure that, if a minister leaves the Government, space is left between them and the policy area that they handled in Government. In spite of the tight numbers, we have managed to do that in Scotland. It is perhaps a lesson that we could pass on to Westminster—the lessons go two ways.
You touched on remuneration. It might be easier for me, as someone who is leaving the Parliament, to say this, but there is a disconnect in that we have conveners who do a huge amount of extra work in the role that is not appreciated—they get no remuneration for it. It is not about the money; that is not why you become a politician. Most folk in our Parliament would earn more doing whatever they were doing before they were elected, so it is not about the money. However, if you are a committee convener, you have to do extra work but are not remunerated, whereas, if you take another path—as a junior minister, a minister or a cabinet secretary, for example—you are remunerated. Would remuneration make our committee structures more effective and give the conveners the esteem that they deserve?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Cristina, do you have any thoughts on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
What you have said begs the question of whether we should do an inquiry into the number of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ that are needed for a committee to be effective. That might be a question for a different inquiry.
Before I bring in Professor Leston-Bandeira on those points, I will chuck in a couple of other points that she might want to comment on. It would be good to hear whether there are other areas in which the Scottish Parliament’s system is working well that we should highlight. Could we learn lessons from other legislatures that are doing things well?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I was going to talk about something else, but, as we are discussing pre-legislative scrutiny, I will give a couple of examples of where I think that we, as a Parliament, have managed to get the balance right. The Lobbying (Scotland) Bill—I was the minister responsible at the time—was very much shaped by the committee’s work. It almost felt as though it might have been better for it to be a committee bill, but those are difficult. The Parliament managed to find a way to deal with that.
Another example of pre-legislative scrutiny that I hope will develop into a bill is the work on conversion practices. Right at the start of the parliamentary session, the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee did the work and decided that it was too complex to be a committee bill, so it asked the Government to do it. We have not got there yet, but, clearly, the challenge is in ensuring that, when that happens, all the pre-legislative scrutiny work that the committee did will not have to be redone by the Government and then redone by the committee.
That is the big challenge, which brings me to the point that I was originally going to come in on—namely, the timelines. I joined the Parliament in the third session, in 2007, and it feels to me as though, as every parliamentary session goes on, bills are taking longer. I am certain that Steven MacGregor will be able to confirm whether that is just my feeling or a fact. I think that it is a fact that, as a Parliament, we are taking longer to deal with all the bills—probably mainly at stage 1—but it would be good to hear the witnesses’ thoughts on whether that is the case.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Do you think that, if we codify it, we need to codify it specifically for certain committees? You have mentioned one that is quite public facing.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I will ask you guys to put a bit of context to where we are now and how people look at the Parliament. I will ask my first set of questions and you can answer whichever bit you want to. What is unique about the Scottish Parliament’s system, and what mechanisms affect its effectiveness? How might judgments on committees’ effectiveness be influenced by the history and political culture of Scotland?
Professor Cairney mentioned expectations of Scottish Parliament committees. How have those expectations developed? What do we expect from committees, and has that influenced how the Parliament has evolved? Dr Caygill, do you want to go first?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I am sorry just to throw this in, but would convener elections help with that as well?