The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1229 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
That is great鈥攖hank you. The committee is aware that our role today is not to consider whether we agree with the proposal; it is to consider the statement of reasons. We have to be satisfied with two things before we agree to set aside the normal process that members follow in consulting before they lodge a bill proposal: first, that the previous consultation was robust; and secondly, that the previous consultation remains relevant.
Let me ask about the robustness of the consultation. First, I have seen a lot of stuff about percentages flying around, but the overall number of responses was quite low. Why was that? The number certainly seems low in comparison with other consultations, especially given that the issue seems relevant. Secondly, in your statement of reasons, you said that 225 organisations were contacted; will you give us a breakdown of those organisations?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Would you be willing to come back in later, Maggie? It might be possible to for members to pick up on other points after other members have asked their questions.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
I will follow on from the points that you have made. We received a letter from the cabinet secretary making it clear that, in her view, the right to food is central to the wider human rights work. I note that a number of respondents to Elaine Smith鈥檚 consultation made the point that, rather than the issue being taken forward in isolation, it should be part of a wider human rights approach and wider legislation.
We now have a manifesto commitment, which is in the agreement between the Scottish Government and the Scottish Green Party and is re-emphasised in the letter that we received from the cabinet secretary. Does that not make a significant difference to what was consulted on more than a year ago, when none of that was in place? We now have certainty that the Government will take the matter forward.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
We move to Pam Gosal. Can you hear us, Pam?
We will go back to Pam after we have heard from Karen Adam.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Thanks very much for that, Nina. I thought that you would want to come in, particularly when you heard the answers, but Pam Duncan-Glancy was trying to appease me.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
One would hope that the Parliament could work together on the matter. My point was not really the one that Rhoda Grant picked up on. It was more about the relevance of the consultation that took place and whether anything has changed鈥攎y point was that what has changed is that commitments have been made. However, Rhoda Grant might have said as much as she wants to in that area.
As nobody wants to contribute further, I thank Rhoda Grant for her evidence. I hope that we were not too challenging in our questioning. I know that being on the other side of the table is a hugely different experience.
We are required to make a decision on whether we are satisfied by the statement of reasons. I remind members that our decision should be based on whether we agree that the member鈥檚 statement of reasons means that no further consultation on the proposal is necessary. We are not deliberating on whether we agree or disagree with the principle of the bill. That would be for a later stage, depending on the outcome today.
Given that Fulton MacGregor will be joining us remotely, I propose to call each member in turn and ask them to indicate whether they are satisfied. For clarity, if members are satisfied, I ask them to vote yes; if they are not satisfied, I ask them to vote no; or they can abstain. I will go around the room, starting with the deputy convener.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you. Emma Congreve is next.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Welcome to the fifth meeting in session 6 of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. We have received no apologies.
Under agenda item 1, the committee is invited to decide whether to take in private items 3 and 4, which are consideration of the evidence that we will take under item 2 and of our approach to longer-term development work on pre-budget scrutiny. Do members agree to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you very much. We will now hear from Dr Angela O鈥橦agan.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
As a couple of you mentioned, this is the first time that any parliamentary committee has taken a human rights approach to its budget scrutiny, so we are in a learning process. It would be helpful if you could give us any pointers to areas in which we need to make sure that we are getting things right.
Emma, you mentioned the data. Maybe you could identify areas of data on which we need to push the Government or other agencies to help us to do our job in taking a human rights approach.
10:15