The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2447 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Bob Doris
You can have one more if you want.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Bob Doris
I am not trying to put you on the spot. If you could come back to us with some more information, that would genuinely be helpful.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Bob Doris
Could you expand on that a little bit? Thinking of the underlying question, the committee will be wrestling with what are desirable policy objectives. Do we legislate to secure those, or are there potential other routes under the national performance framework?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Bob Doris
That is helpful for the committee to hear.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Bob Doris
I will stick with you, Duncan. I am not trying to contradict you in relation to the Welsh experience but, although the evidence that we have had in relation to the Welsh experience has been broadly positive, 10 years in, that is more to do with a cultural change and a change in awareness, rather than any tangible, concrete improvements. I hope that I am not misrepresenting the evidence—please just tell me if I have got that wrong.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Bob Doris
I will follow up briefly. I am in danger of putting my knowledge gap on the record. Earlier, Ellie Twist mentioned case law relating to a judge enforcing what “due regard” should mean in practice and saying that it should be substantial, meaningful and tangible. Does the bill have a judicial pathway to enforcement? Earlier, I asked you what teeth the bill had, and you did not mention any judicial route. Can we use that case law meaningfully in relation to this bill?
I am conscious that Jenny Munro has also spoken about the fact that the bill should not give any additional duties. The purpose of the bill, in theory, would be to enforce what we already want to see happen, and that is why I asked the question about teeth. Is there a judicial route? What routes are there for enforcement when local authorities or public bodies are not meeting those responsibilities?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Bob Doris
So, it could be a legal matter, apparently. Do you have any thoughts on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Bob Doris
I did notice, Sarah, but I was not going to say anything.
I thank all the witnesses for their time this morning. Your evidence has been very helpful for the committee.
I ask you to stay seated for a moment while we dispose of one more agenda item, which will be very brief, before we move into private session. If you could stay where you are for the moment, that would be very helpful.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Bob Doris
We move to our next item of business, which is consideration of a Scottish statutory instrument. The regulations before us are subject to the negative procedure. Do members have any comments on the instrument?
It seems not—although I thought that you did just for a moment, Mr Balfour.
In that case, I invite the committee to agree that it does not wish to make any further recommendations in relation to the instrument. Are members content with that approach to the regulations?
Members indicated agreement.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Bob Doris
I do not want to misrepresent the Welsh situation. You mentioned that the 2015 act gives teeth to the pursuit of sustainable development objectives, and you also mentioned the development and setting of plans by various public bodies. Can you give an example of Welsh commissioners using those teeth?