The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2403 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 September 2021
Colin Beattie
I hope that he is there.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 September 2021
Colin Beattie
There are a couple of areas in which I would like to ask questions. The first question is for Malcolm Roughead. Can you provide an update as to where we are on phase 1 and phase 2 of the tourism recovery plan? Will the expected funding for phase 2 be in the scale that you would hope for?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 September 2021
Colin Beattie
How are you monitoring the success or failure of the different elements of phase 1?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Colin Beattie
Perhaps I am being too simplistic, but it seems to me that if you have the indicators, and all the data goes into the indicators on a comparable basis among councils, there must, if you look across the board, be something in common in the councils in which there are declining indicators. There must be something that you can put your finger on in each case and say that it is the most common factor.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Colin Beattie
I will move on to something that we have already talked about a little bit—exams. Paragraph 42 on page 22 of the report correctly says that the people who work in education are very much focused
“on children’s and young people’s wellbeing as a key priority”.
So they should be.
Is it possible to measure that focus in any way? So many things have happened in respect of local authorities and the Scottish Government trying to support young people through focusing on their health and wellbeing, and on ensuring that they are in a safe environment. Is there any way to measure that? Can an objective view be taken on it? It has obviously taken a huge amount of time, resources and effort.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Colin Beattie
Thank you, convener. The report overall seems to be pretty positive, but of course, this being the Public Audit Committee, we have to focus on the negative bits. Key message 4 on page 5 of the report says that there is
“wide variation of educational performance across councils”,
in terms not only of declining performance but of improvements, against indicators. I am thinking back to previous discussions that we have had around the committee table. Are you satisfied that the indicators and how they are constructed by councils are directly comparable across the whole council scene?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Colin Beattie
Surely, the elements that go into populating indicators are the same in every council. If they are not, they are not comparable.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Colin Beattie
So, variation in indicators must be directly comparable between councils. In spite of variations in numbers of teachers and all the other things, the indicators themselves should be robust.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Colin Beattie
I will follow on from that. Given that, in a number of councils, indicators have gone the wrong way, are there any signs, looking across the board, that there is a common denominator? Is it mostly to do with schools in more deprived areas? Is there a social element? Is there a physical element? Is there anything that you can point to as the cause of indicators going down in a particular place?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Colin Beattie
It seems to me that indicators are there to inform and guide us on future investment and future focus on where we put resources. If the current indicators do not do that, is there a case for saying that however comparable they might be, and however accurate they might be, we need different indicators in order to extract more detailed or cogent information that will allow us to take decisions? Is that possible?