˿

Skip to main content

Language: English /

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 28 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2416 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

I will pick up on something that you said there. You very carefully said that the staff working for the Crofting Commission were under Scottish Government terms and conditions. Is that the same as saying that they are employees of the Scottish Government who are seconded to the Crofting Commission?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

I have one final question on the back of what we have been talking about. You have already indicated that it is not unusual for there to be seconded staff from the Scottish Government in NDPBs. Although you may not have an answer to this, based on what we are talking about, is that mostly staff being employed on Scottish Government terms and conditions, or is it actually staff being seconded from the Scottish Government, or is it both?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of NHS National Services Scotland”; and “Personal protective equipment”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

Do we have a cost for that?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of NHS National Services Scotland”; and “Personal protective equipment”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

If there is any information on that, I would be interested in it, because obviously there is a cost to the public purse. Although PPE is essential and the Government is doing everything that it can to ensure that it is available, there is nevertheless a cost, and we should monitor that.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of NHS National Services Scotland”; and “Personal protective equipment”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

So it is actually a back-up, rather than primary provision.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of NHS National Services Scotland”; and “Personal protective equipment”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

So everything is now regularised.

My next question is slightly different. The report outlines that NHS NSS took a range of measures to support contact tracing. However, the report does not outline the impact of those measures on the programme overall. To what extent has the success or otherwise of those measures been evaluated?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

I will take a slightly different angle. Your “Crofting Commission Report to the Audit and Finance Committee on the ‘Audit Dimensions and Best Value’ for the year ended 31 March 2021” states that the commissioners

“were apparently unaware of the fact that the Commission can employ staff in their own right, rather than through seconding staff from the Scottish Government.”

Is that correct?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

I can remember at least half a dozen without even thinking about it, so I do not think that it is a small percentage. If the total number of NDPBs is 40-odd, that makes it 10 per cent or more, which I would call significant.

The question is whether the issue has been recognised by the Government and, if so, whether it is taking steps to do something about it. There is no indication of that in the report. How do we take the issue forward? How do we emphasise it? Should we be investigating it? Should we be really focused on it and driving forward with it? There seems to be a real issue, here.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

I will put you on the spot a little bit. You have obviously recognised the issues and problems that repeatedly arise. What communications have you had with the Scottish Government, other than through the section 22 reports? What relationship do you have with the Government? What communications have you had with the Government to put forward your concerns and get it to understand and take them on board, and take action?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Colin Beattie

On the confusion of roles by the previous convener, should the role of convener have been clear to that person? Was it laid out in such a way that there should not have been any ambiguity when it came to the issues that are listed in the report?