łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content

Language: English /

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 26 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2403 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Administration of Scottish income tax 2023-24”

Meeting date: 26 March 2025

Colin Beattie

What you have said actually emphasises my concerns. The NAO report shows so many estimates, projections and UK-wide calculations, including for the south-east of England—which, of course, distorts any figures for any other place—and we are relying on those figures to calculate the Scottish rate of income tax. Looking at the NAO report, you would say, “My gosh, so many areas here are actually quite weak.” However, when I speak to HMRC or to you, you give reassurance that things are not, in fact, quite as drastic as they would appear in the NAO report. Would you agree with that?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Administration of Scottish income tax 2023-24”

Meeting date: 26 March 2025

Colin Beattie

If it were to be possible to get that information, that would be really helpful.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Colin Beattie

As you suggest, the Scottish Government’s position seems to be that the tribunal is a last resort, but there is no requirement for parents to explore mediation before resorting to that route. What can the Scottish Government do to address that? In your view, would a mandatory mediation process prior to tribunal access help to alleviate some of the pressure?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Colin Beattie

I want to flip back to my previous question on the financial and resource pressures on councils. Do we have any idea how much it actually costs to run a tribunal?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Colin Beattie

I suppose that the bottom line that I am trying to get to is this: is it actually cheaper, in all senses, to go down the mediation route rather than to go to tribunal? I am talking not just about the financial and resource costs for the council, but about the outcomes for the people who follow such a route.

10:30  

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Colin Beattie

Paragraph 26 of your briefing highlights that the recorded growth is

“unlikely to be capturing all additional support needs.”

Can you give any detail on what steps are being taken to ensure that the pupils who require ASL are being identified and supported?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Colin Beattie

I want to come back to some of the figures in your briefing, particularly those that are set out in paragraph 22 and exhibit 3. Paragraph 22 says that

“The number of pupils recorded as receiving ASL has increased by 768 per cent since 2004”—

that is, from 4.5 per cent of all pupils to 40 per cent, which is a fairly dramatic increase. I am aware of a high school in my constituency where the figure is 54 per cent. Local councils are saying that those numbers will continue to rise, but what is that view based on?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Colin Beattie

Given that councils have said that demand will continue to increase—which is worrying, although they do not say at what rate—do they have a pipeline that they can look back at to see what sort of volumes will be coming down towards them? They must have something, otherwise they would not be saying that demand was going to continue to increase.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Colin Beattie

I want to move on to a different aspect—the additional support needs tribunal. In paragraphs 42 to 44 of your briefing, you highlight that

“the number of parents and young people making applications to the Additional Support Needs Tribunal ... has increased by two-thirds”

between 2019-20 and 2023-24. That is a huge increase. It might be reflective of the increase in the number of people receiving ASL and disputes coming from that, but it is still a significant rise. What are the main factors that have contributed to that increase? After all, it must have had an impact on the financial resources of individual councils. How has that situation come about?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Colin Beattie

Is this another case in which the data is collected differently by different local authorities, with the result that you cannot compare it and see whether you have a list of the additional support needs for one pupil, or is it simply the case that it is not done in some places?