˿

Skip to main content

Language: English /

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 29 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2063 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Train and Bus Services

Meeting date: 22 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

I actually want to address my question to Gordon Martin and Kevin Lindsay. It is about the changes in station staffing and whether they have implications for managing antisocial behaviour. In particular, I was thinking about situations where a lone worker is managing a station with reduced hours and reduced staffing and how that works in antisocial behaviour hotspots at particular stations. A bit of an insight on that from the rail industry would be useful.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill:Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

I have a question about the target areas that are not included in the bill. The advisory group originally recommended targets on positive outcomes for biodiversity from public sector and Government policy—for example, on investment in nature. Do you have a view on those areas? Do you already set targets in those areas?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill:Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

Does Mark Lodge have anything to add?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill:Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

The bill will change the duty on relevant public bodies. Currently, they have to “have regard to” national park plans, which will shift towards a duty to “facilitate the implementation of” the plans. I am interested in the perspectives of all three of you about what might change as a result of that.

Grant, I am aware of the long and difficult history with Highlands and Islands Enterprise in relation to the management of Cairngorm mountain. I am aware that there might be tensions in relation to Forestry and Land Scotland and that there are definitely tensions in the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park and perhaps further afield. What will change as a result of the wording changing from “have regard to” to “facilitate the implementation of”?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill:Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

How will that change the dynamic in relation to HIE specifically? In your example, you are talking about areas in which there is already a degree of consensus—changes that need to happen with deer management—so you are pushing public agencies to deliver similar objectives. I am interested in the areas in which there might be tension between a commercial interest and the aims of the park. Will the change in the law change that dynamic?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill:Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

Mark, what does this look like from a local authority perspective?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill:Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

Okay. Grant Moir, do you have any desire for extra powers?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill:Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

Do you already report to your board on areas such as the understanding of citizens and society? Are they already key performance areas in the park?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill:Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

Will the provision implicitly change the status of the park plan? For the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park, for example, what would come first: the park plan or Forestry and Land Scotland’s plan for its own estate within the park? Which will have primacy?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill:Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

On the back of that, I am interested to know whether you think that there should be some form of non-regression provision in the bill. We might be talking about a vulnerable species with a poor conservation status, and there might be a very restricted range—it might be the last habitat. It would seem that a non-regression provision could apply quite well in such situations. What Grant Moir is describing is more of a landscape-scale restoration scenario whereby there is a need for flexibility around different habitats and species. Is there a bottom line, and does the bill get it right? Should there be something in the bill that articulates non-regression in a way that protects the bottom line for species recovery?