The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3162 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you, John. Incidentally, I want to ask a question before I go to colleagues: when did pie charts become fan charts? They were always pie charts when I was at school. [Laughter.]
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Indeed. You mention towards the end of your report “the Finnish practice”, the “Committee of the Future” and the “Report of the Future” that it must produce.
You also say:
“If Social Security spending rises more quickly in Scotland then equivalent spending elsewhere ... then in the absence of significant borrowing powers, plans made by other departments will instead be disrupted.”
Do you think that there is an inability to deal effectively with annual pay rises? Is that also a major issue facing the Government? We have seen almost unrealistic pay suggestions—I will call them suggestions rather than anything else—of 3 per cent a year for three years being put into the budget. Is there any possibility or likelihood that such suggestions will be held to, or is there a strong possibility that the Government will once again have to bring out an emergency statement in the autumn because it will again be giving higher settlements than were set out in the budget that was passed in February?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Your point about loss aversion has been well made over the past two or three years, and I completely agree with your view on that.
Mairi, what is your view? Do you think that committees feel that they put in a lot of effort and do a lot of work for no real reward? Does the Scottish Government actually listen to committees? You write about this committee in your report, in which you say:
“The FPAC scrutiny of tax policy has succeeded in moving the conversation to net tax yields of income tax measures rather than static, which has been a really positive step and moves the discussion away from the unhelpful and unrealistic large numbers from static costings.”
You point out that this committee has had some influence on the budget, although not as much as we would like.
Are there any areas where subject committees have made a significant difference to how the budget is ultimately arrived at, or is it just about the Government getting politicians into a corner and putting them in a room to hammer things out until there is a majority for the budget?
11:00Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you for that. The first colleague to ask questions will be Liz Smith, followed by John Mason.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You have said:
“The OBR does not have any role in forecasting or scrutinising public spending decisions taken by the Scottish Government as part of the Scottish Budget process. However, it is an important part of the role we play in the UK Budget process and is area where we have significantly enhanced our approach over the past year.”
What impact, if any, has that had on UK budgetary decisions relating to Scotland?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You have talked about undertaking
“deeper analytical assessments of drivers of our devolved tax forecasts”.
Will you touch on a couple of those?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Okay. Thanks. Since 2022, you have introduced forecast evaluation analysis for your Scottish forecasts. How has that improved accuracy on your forecasts?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Colleagues might wish to explore that further. We could ask about hundreds of things, and I am sure that colleagues will dig deep.
A final question from me—what is the ideal time period for a spending review? For example, Mairi, you have said that
“Spending reviews should be shorter than a Parliamentary term, allowing for changes in policy priorities midway through it.”
What is ideal? Is it two or three years? What do you think?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The kind of induction that we get as ˿ is nothing whatsoever to do with the practicalities of examining the budget—it is all weird and wonderful stuff, I have to be honest. That is an important point that we might want to add to the committee’s legacy report about what we need to see happening. The Parliament will have lots of new members, given the number of retirements and, indeed, the outcome of the upcoming election.
Mairi Spowage, do you want to make any final points? Is there anything that you feel we have not yet touched on?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
We need a Scottish version of Estonia’s X-Road, in my view. Craig Hoy is next.