The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 187 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
Sure.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
Okay—I hope that you will indulge me.
To date, the consultants who have been employed by Transport Scotland have spent something like £19 million. Are you aware that work package 1 of the contract requires a STAG appraisal to be carried out? That has not been done. Are you also aware that a design for the promised active travel route alongside the A82 has not been produced? In addition, it has been suggested that some of the cost estimates might be slightly inaccurate. Therefore, it might be useful for the petitioners, Transport Scotland and the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Authority to have a meeting to understand some of those issues.
While I am talking about the national park authority, I will add a second question. If there have been any discussions with the national park authority, on what date did those take place? I ask that because of how sensitive the bit of the A82 that we are talking about is, as it borders Loch Lomond. You will appreciate that, as you know the area. There are plans for the national park authority to regenerate and extend the Atlantic oak woodlands and the natural habitat corridors that exist there. It strikes me that the low road option is probably the least sensitive when it comes to respecting that environment.
I rolled two questions into one, convener.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
The A83.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
I think that the road outstrips us all.
The petitioners’ third petition, PE1916, calls for a public inquiry into the “political and financial mismanagement” of the A83. Things have moved on substantially, but I note that their first petition was lodged in 2012, so we have been at this for a long time, and we are at the foothills of something starting to happen. I think that we all appreciate the petitioners’ frustration.
In focusing on the future, could the cabinet secretary provide some indicative detail on how much money will be needed and when? I assume that you have profiled the capital. Assuming—touch wood—that the draft orders go through and that there are no objections or a requirement for a full inquiry, what will the likely timeline be?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
As a local who uses that road, where are you going to divert people to? Are we going to have to go on to the loch to get around the construction? Frankly, that is the only way that it is going to work. It is the most challenging roads project.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
I may have slightly more to say about the petition.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
The Rest and Be Thankful.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
If I have picked you up correctly, you are saying that, with a fair wind, the timeline could be six years.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
I will try to be quick, convener.
The petitioners are in the public gallery; I think that they understand your reasoning, cabinet secretary, but they disagree with it. They were surprised to see reference in work package 1 to the requirement for a STAG appraisal. I do not know whether that was missed by officials.
I am interested in your views on whether the low road route is the best one in relation to traffic hold-ups. You will appreciate that the A82 is an extremely busy route. If you construct on the existing route, the hold-ups will be a nightmare. They will be catastrophic for the area. A high road is a better option. What analysis have you done of the resilience of roads and of the traffic disturbance that would be caused by sticking to the low route?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
Speedboats at the ready. [Laughter.]
10:45