The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1446 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
Some people who return to a committee in different parliamentary sessions find the same questions that have been considered previously are still hanging in front of the committee.
I am slightly conscious of time but I want to finish by getting a snapshot of one word. We have talked around the concept but the word “trust”—where it should lie and which way it should go—has not actually been spoken out loud today. I will gently look around the panel to give the witnesses a couple of seconds to consider that.
I will come to Meg Russell first. Trust: how does it lie, where does it lie, and how should committees respond to, and stand up to, that requirement?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
Do you want to add to that, Marc?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Our second agenda item is consideration of an annual update on cross-party groups’ compliance with the requirements of section 6 of the code of conduct. Members have a note from the clerks that sets out the extent to which each group has operated in compliance with the code. I invite comments from members on the annual report and the state of some of our CPGs.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you for that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Yes.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you for that. If anything comes to mind after this session, please feel free to write or to contact the clerks about it.
I highlight the penultimate paragraph in your opening statement, which I found really interesting. This is the 20th anniversary of the 2002 act coming into force. Maybe it should not have passed its 10th anniversary. As we have touched on in relation to a number of matters, there is a need for proactive publication of information. We live in a digital age, we have AI—whatever that means, and it means different things to different people—and the landscape is changing very rapidly. There seems to be a need for us to consider that as soon as the Parliament is able to.
I thank Euan McCulloch, Claire Stephen and especially David Hamilton for their attendance today and look forward to engaging in the future.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
I do not disagree with any of the comments that committee members have made. I note that, on 10 January this year, we had 119 cross-party groups. CPGs form an important part of how people outside the Parliament can engage with their łÉČËżěĘÖ. Indeed, the groups often allow people to engage with the Government and to give their lived experience, expertise and views when decisions are made. However, the annual report is a really challenging and disappointing read, given the failures.
Does the committee agree to deal with the question of whether we continue to accord accreditation to those CPGs at a later date?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
I am certainly not going to comment on your choice of ChatGPT as an artificial intelligence platform. It is interesting that, as we contemplate having an environment of positive publication with regard to freedom of information, such AI tools will be able to provide a different nuance to information that currently is quite remote and to get beyond the point of people saying, “I have this—what’s next?”. Your comments on the specific barriers that young people face and the engagement that you are doing to break those down are massively important.
That takes me back to your undertaking to review the strategic plan after 12 months. You have discussed your approach of moving from promoting the idea of freedom of information to highlighting access to it. Is that the extent to which you are reviewing the strategic plan? Now that you have been working under it as it was presented to you, are you confident that it is fit for purpose? Does it reflect where the commission wants to see itself in 12 months’ time?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is no problem and thank you for that information. We will move to questions, and I will kick off with the fact that this is, of course, the 20th anniversary. In some ways, 1 January 2005 seems like a long time ago and, in other ways, it seems like only yesterday.
I was fascinated by your comments at the end of your opening remarks about the involvement of young people and working with the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland. We have had 20 years of a landscape where we have seen improvements—sometimes substantial, more frequently just gradual—in the legislative framework, which we will get to in a minute. Beyond engaging with the Children and Young People’s Commissioner, what thoughts have you had about engaging with young people and how to capture the importance to them of freedom of information? My experience is that they frequently ask questions to which they could get the answers on their own if they were more aware and the regime was more friendly towards young people.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Martin Whitfield
Following on from that, there is the perennial question of “How well is it going?” What are the early indications of success for the strategic plan and the proposals that it contains?