The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1446 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
Marc Geddes, do you want to comment on that?
10:15Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
Does the concept of flipping the selection鈥攄oing conveners first then drawing on the committee鈥攁nswer the challenge that you put, Brian?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
I want to move on to the next topic, which is expectations of committees and whose expectations of committees we should pay attention to. What is the academic understanding of and knowledge about the effectiveness of committees and the members on them, or is that an iterative area of study? We have made reference to very substantial reports that have looked at many different committees. How well do we understand the questions that we are asking?
09:30Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
Your two insights and all the insights from the witnesses today have been very valuable and incredibly interesting.
I thank you all for your time this morning. If there are any other thoughts, particularly from Meg Russell, whom I dropped in at the deep end with that last question, or if there is anything that you would like to add, 鈥渏ust phone the clerk鈥濃攖o use Brian Taylor鈥檚 phrase鈥攁s a way in. Thank you very much.
10:42 Meeting continued in private until 11:14.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
Do you want to comment, Meg?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
Sir David, do you want to come in?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
I think that Meg Russell would like to come in.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
Our second agenda item is an evidence session as part of our committee effectiveness inquiry, which is seeking to answer the question of whether changes to the Parliament鈥檚 procedures and practices would help committees to work more effectively. In recent weeks, we have launched a public call for views on the inquiry. We have invited consultation responses from committees, the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body, political parties and individual 成人快手. We have also written to a range of legislatures, asking for information on how their committees operate and evaluate their work.
Today鈥檚 session is the first in a series of four oral evidence sessions as part of our inquiry. We are joined by our committee inquiry adviser, Dr Danielle Beswick, who is sitting to my right. Today, we will explore and try to answer the overarching questions of how committees are viewed externally and how we can evaluate their impact.
I am grateful to welcome Gemma Diamond, who is director of innovation and transformation at Audit Scotland; Dr Marc Geddes, who is a senior lecturer in politics at the University of Edinburgh; Sir David Natzler KCB, who was clerk to the House of Commons between 2015 and 2019, clerk of committees between 2008 and 2009 and clerk to the Reform of the House of Commons Committee, which is known as the Wright committee, between 2009 and 2010; Brian Taylor, who is a former BBC Scotland political editor, a columnist for The Herald and a long-time observer of this Parliament; and Professor Meg Russell, who is director of the constitution unit at University College London.
As this is a round-table evidence session, although we will take the usual approach of members asking witnesses questions, we will seek the opportunity for witnesses to have a discussion between themselves and to have an evidence session that is perhaps more open and free flowing than the ones that sometimes take place in committees. There is no expectation that witnesses should answer every question. When the witnesses who are appearing remotely wish to respond to a question or make a comment, they should type R in the chat function or just jump in.
We will move to the first of our facilitating questions, which is about the characteristics of a successful committee. I will hand over to Sue Webber.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is why I left it until the end.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
Let me press you on one area. What is the role of the spectacle of politics that we sometimes see in committees? We certainly see it in the chamber. In committees, what are the advantages and disadvantages of that? What is its role and importance?