The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1446 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
We have an outward-looking vehicle that reaches out to the public: the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee. By many accounts, it is well received and effective. Do we need to take the next step, which is to use the skills that we have to be outward-looking in involving the public鈥攊ncluding in the Parliament building鈥攁nd mine that resource for the purpose of bill scrutiny at a much more specific individual committee level? Would that assist?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
Can the specialism, expertise and brilliant support given to committees offset the lack of expertise among 成人快手 who sit on committees? Is that a safe counterbalance, or should 成人快手 have a level of expertise in relation to committee work?
I do not know who wants to have a go at that question.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
Our second item is the second in a series of four oral evidence sessions in our committee effectiveness inquiry. The inquiry is seeking to answer the question of whether changes to the Parliament鈥檚 procedures and practices would help committees to work more effectively. Our call for written views from political parties, committees and individual members of the Scottish Parliament closes on Friday 4 April. The call for views from the public runs until Tuesday 22 April. Today, we are seeking to explore committee effectiveness in the context of the culture of the Scottish Parliament, as well as to gather broader perspectives on issues that were raised in our previous session, on 20 March, which focused on how committees are viewed externally and how their impact is evaluated.
We are joined online by our committee inquiry adviser, Dr Danielle Beswick. I welcome the members of the panel: Professor Paul Cairney, professor of politics and public policy at the University of Stirling; Dr Tom Caygill, senior lecturer in politics at Nottingham Trent University; Ken Hughes, former assistant chief executive at the Scottish Parliament; and Professor Cristina Leston-Bandeira, professor of politics at the University of Leeds.
This is a round-table evidence session. Although there will be the usual approach of questions from members to witnesses, it is intended that there will be opportunity for discussion between the witnesses in order to encourage a more open and free-flowing session. There is no expectation that all witnesses will answer all questions. Anyone who wishes to come in on a question or on a response made by another witness should indicate that and I will bring you in at the appropriate moment.
We move to questions, and it falls to me, as convener, to kick things off. My opening gambit is to Professor Cairney. I know that you have done a huge amount of work on Government legislation and on the valuability of achievement of the scrutiny of that legislation. In the past, you have been critical of the effectiveness of that scrutiny. Does that view still stand, or have you seen changes that have improved things? Perhaps you have seen changes the other way.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
It was constructive.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you, Ken. That helps, because it means that I can again remind people that the public call for views in our inquiry is open until Tuesday 22 April.
I put the same question to Cristina Leston-Bandeira.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
Before I bring in David Natzler, I ask whether we are really talking about a description of a committee where, rather than every politician who sits on the committee bringing their vested interest, it is about developing a team that can sit behind the committee identity to sometimes potentially defeat the whips鈥攖wo of us are sitting here鈥攂ut more important, to put aside party politics and use the strength of the committee as an institution to justify why difficult decisions are made. I ask Sir David to respond to that and the previous point.
09:45Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
Are we seeking free media training at this point?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
Sir David, do you have a comment, before I hand back to Rona?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
We are ahead of the game on that鈥攚ell, at the front of it. Joe, did you want to come in?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
Sir David, you can reassure your friend that some questions are probably already in the post to him.
As I am the convener and I am speaking, I am going to do that thing of reminding myself that we are short of time. I will bring in Meg Russell, and I will then hand over to Annie Wells.