The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 788 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Craig Hoy
Thank you. From a national or international policy perspective, to move that forward to the next phase, political will and public bodies will set the framework that allows community empowerment to thrive. To what extent are all parts of the public sector in Scotland currently supporting and empowering communities? Is there any ready-made template of international best practice or policy that we could embed in Scotland to improve that empowerment and engagement? That question is for Pippa Coutts first.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Craig Hoy
I ask Euan Leitch the same question. You talked about the fact that your predecessor said, “We do not need any more policy; we just need practice.” How can we move forward from policy to doing, in practical terms, what Pippa Coutts talked about? It strikes me that that is very much about moving away from firefighting and starting to plan for the long term.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Craig Hoy
I am one of the ˿ for South Scotland. I draw attention to my entry in the register of interests, as I will refer to it later. I am an East Lothian councillor.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Craig Hoy
Perhaps Ryan Smart can comment from a local perspective. You made the point that all the members of your centre’s management board live within five minutes of each other in Glenrothes. However, sometimes the most extreme problems are the ones that are nearest to us, and yet we do not see them. Do you feel that you have made progress on the ground in reaching people with whom you had not engaged previously?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Craig Hoy
Before I ask Stephen Boyle about the audit function, I will bring in Anna Fowlie. Earlier, the Auditor General said that the audit function is far more than a tick-box exercise; it is about learning, evaluating and assessing outcomes. I think that the SCVO has about 2,700 members. Is there still a view that the audit and evaluation process comes at the end and is very much about ticking a box to close a project or to reapply for funding? Is enough learning taking place in the sector to ensure that we evaluate, assess the outcomes, and collectively learn from what has or has not been achieved?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Craig Hoy
The convener mentioned two words that I was going to bring up: participatory budgeting. That is a concrete example of community engagement and empowerment. Given that the local government budget is £11,108 million, by my maths, about £111 million is being spent following some degree of community engagement. Auditor General, should more be done to audit that expenditure—it might not be done in a mandatory sense—not only to ensure that the public pound is being well spent but, more important, to ensure that the audit function is evaluating outcomes so that we can all learn and share best practice to allow us to accelerate the work that we have heard about today?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Craig Hoy
Good morning, Mr Boyle. You have partly answered the first question that I was going to ask, but I wonder whether you can elaborate on the subject a bit more. Paragraph 12 on page 5 of the report states:
“The Commission does not have an overriding ‘Code of Corporate Governance’ or equivalent.”
To what extent has the lack of a code of corporate governance contributed to the issues that have been identified in the report? Are there other contributing factors?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Craig Hoy
You mentioned that the vote of no confidence has been withdrawn since the original issue came to light. The report refers to the letter that was sent by the then convener of the commission to the then Cabinet Secretary for Rural Economy and Tourism, which notes that subsequent meetings have taken place between the board, the chief executive and the current cabinet secretary. Have you been made aware of the nature and content of those meetings? If so, will you update us on what might have occurred in them?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Craig Hoy
The Royal College of Nursing, the British Medical Association and care professionals raised widely reported concerns about access to, use of and shortage of PPE very early on in the pandemic. Are you aware of any on-going concerns from healthcare, social care or other professionals about access to, use of or quality of PPE today?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Craig Hoy
Between March and June 2020, the modelling to assess the required supplies was based on Covid numbers. After that, it was based on staff numbers. Would you say that that is the most appropriate and optimal way of doing it?