The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 788 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Craig Hoy
Okay. The table mentions protective characteristics or something. It just seemed a bit odd that you could identify that five people were appointed but you could not break that down.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Craig Hoy
I think that the OBR has about 52 staff. You identified the issue in relation to the way in which the OBR operates in forecasting for the Treasury and undertaking other modelling, and you identified that the situation with the fiscal framework is more complex. Is it just a given that, because we do not have the economy of scale in Scotland, the SFC appears disproportionately large compared with, for example, the OBR?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Craig Hoy
Yes, I know that there is a memorandum of understanding. Is there any duplication that you could identify on which the MOU could go further or could be looked at again, perhaps to make things better for your workload and that of the OBR?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Craig Hoy
Super—thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Craig Hoy
I have a follow-up question on diversity and inclusion based on the table that is part of paragraph 85 of the “Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2024”. On those who apply for roles in the organisation, it has numbers for the categories of male, female and those who prefer not to say, but you have not provided information on the numbers who were successful at interview or who agreed to start broken down by gender. The notation says that that is
“suppressed due to the small numbers involved.”
You can say that a total of five people were successful at interview. What is the threshold that prevents you from telling us what the gender make-up is of that number?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Craig Hoy
On staffing numbers, if I am reading the figures correctly, you have about 20 staff.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Craig Hoy
I got that impression.
In all Governments, including in the UK, I assume that there is merit in having a look at whether the structures are fit for purpose and as efficient and effective as possible. You came into being formally in 2016, which was a time when, politically, there was a sense of what I would call Scottish exceptionalism—other people might come to a different conclusion on that. Given the interdependence of and interconnectivity between the Scottish and the UK public finances, and given that the bodies that we have in the UK are not asymmetrical—that came up when we were in Belfast recently—is there merit in looking again at whether the structure that we have is the most effective and efficient one? Is there a case, for example, for considering somehow making the SFC part of the OBR, as its Scottish division? Would that not also perhaps have the merit of making you slightly more distant from the Scottish Government, which would address any underlying concerns about your independence from Government?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Craig Hoy
Fine.
On the broader role and remit of the organisation, the OECD points to there potentially being an issue in relation to your independence and funding. Can anything be done that could give you greater clarity that this Government or a future one might not use funding as a means by which to somehow neuter your activities?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Craig Hoy
You think that progress is being made and that there is greater awareness in the Government that the process is not helpful.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Craig Hoy
We could call that permanent chaos, but it helps us to identify something that the convener alluded to. Broadening and deepening your spending analysis beyond social security and giving you a greater remit to plan for scenarios might be more important in an environment such as that in Scotland, where we have those political cycles, because bodies such as the SFC provide solid, politically neutral analysis that allows Governments of all political persuasions to make informed choices.