The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 606 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Emma Roddick
I imagine that it is easy to come up against those conflicts when a body has other aims and strategies that it is working towards, which may not align with those of the national parks. What are the most common conflicts?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Emma Roddick
Yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Emma Roddick
Does anyone have any views on whether there are further opportunities for public bodies to be more involved in the national park plan creation process or to align themselves more closely with it?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Emma Roddick
That is in situations such as those that you described earlier, where a reduction in protection on the face of it could improve the situation overall. Do you trust that those powers would always be used appropriately?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Emma Roddick
In relation to the new powers, the Government has notably not included a non-regression provision. What are your views on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Emma Roddick
I suppose that what I am getting at is that the powers could be used for the sake of alignment rather than for the improvement of biodiversity. Should there be some kind of protection? Perhaps you would have to give an environmental reason for why that reduction in protection is beneficial or potentially beneficial to nature.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Emma Roddick
In the context of that expansion, are there other crimes that you consider should form the next part of that managed process?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Emma Roddick
I want to press you on the victim statement issue, particularly having read the COPFS submission. Given what you know from the crimes for which victims can currently make statements, do you see any potential impact on the seriousness with which they are treated if they start to be used in different courts?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Emma Roddick
I will press the point a little further, Stuart. It sounds to me as though there is a little bit of a contradiction in the use of language around why the bill is necessary, with the theft of a dog being described as the theft of a family member, which is a more emotional thing, and then moving back when it comes to guide dogs. Accepting that guide dogs can be part of the family as well, the language is more about their consideration as equipment, which can currently be sentenced. Is there a confusion or could such confusion arise if the bill is passed? Is there a contradiction in approaches that might complicate matters?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Emma Roddick
This question is open to anybody. Does the argument that guide dogs are hard to replace and that they have to be trained and matched to the person they support also apply to other working dogs? Is there an argument for an aggravation in relation to other types of trained dogs?