The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 613 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Emma Roddick
My first question is about child poverty. We expect that, by reducing child poverty, we will create budget savings in other areas, but it is hard to solidly link underspends or reductions in spend elsewhere to a reduction in child poverty. Can you suggest ways in which we can monitor those effects as effectively as possible? How can we evidence knock-on effects and evaluate success on that level?
My other question is about the fiscal framework review. It is fair to say that a hybrid social security model comes with a lot of challenges. We hear a lot about the limitations on future planning because of the threat of changes to the block grant, the extra costs of diverging from UK policy and so on. Does having a hybrid reserved and devolved social security system make financial sense? Can we ever protect the social security budget from risks effectively while we are so intrinsically tied to UK policy decisions?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Emma Roddick
On the topic of budget scrutiny, is it more important for those of us who are tasked with scrutinising social security to make use of the medium-term financial strategy than it is for other committees?
I direct that question to Emma Congreve.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Emma Roddick
It is good to meet you virtually, minister. Thank you for giving us your time this morning.
My question is very much along the same lines as that of my colleague Pam Duncan-Glancy, but I would like a bit more clarity on policy change. You said that you agree that no further changes to ADP are possible at this time, and that that will be for the Scottish criteria in future. Do you appreciate that although there has been devolution of some social security powers, there are limits to those powers? We are not yet entirely clear on where those limits are or on what can be done without risking the eligibility of claimants of devolved benefits to continue to receive their reserved benefits. Is it your intention to reconcile that and to facilitate the Scottish Government鈥檚 policy wishes on devolved benefits?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Emma Roddick
In a previous response, Andrew Latto advised that further costs that are associated with changing eligibility, due to more disabled people being eligible, would result in the Scottish Government being charged for the difference. If it is your intention, as you say, to get disability benefits to all who need it, should the DWP not be leading on changing eligibility to make sure that that happens with reserved benefits, rather than punishing the Scottish Government for doing so?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Emma Roddick
Thank you for your patience with my IT. I wanted to come back in on two points. First, on the issue that we have, while I appreciate the鈥擺Inaudible.]鈥攖o move emphasis and resources because of the pandemic. I note that in a previous response鈥擺Inaudible.]鈥攔ather than punishing the Scottish Government for doing so?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Emma Roddick
I have certainly noticed some difficulties in a Scottish context to do with the hybrid nature of social security at this point. Is the DWP also struggling with the hybrid nature of social security? Do you think that there will be a need to increase devolved powers in the future, to remedy some of the issues that we have covered this morning?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
Emma Roddick
I was initially going to direct my question to Eilidh Dickson, but she has covered the issue already, so I will direct it to Marsha Scott and see whether Eilidh Dickson wants to come in afterwards.
I note from the statistics in our papers that, during the time period stated, disabled women were almost twice as likely to have experienced sexual assault compared with non-disabled women, and that, globally, 90 per cent of women with learning disabilities have been subjected to sexual abuse. In previous evidence sessions, the committee has heard how much more likely it is that refugees and asylum seekers, particularly those with no recourse to public funds, will experience sexual assault and violence.
What is lacking in the support or the policy that is aimed at preventing or reducing the high levels of sexual assault experienced by women with intersecting characteristics?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
Emma Roddick
I mean in terms of initially coming forward and reporting.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
Emma Roddick
This question is for Marsha Scott. I am interested in the approach of front-line services to advising survivors on access to justice. My personal experience is that, often, organisations have to give the advice that people need to be careful about coming forward because of how common further traumatic experience is. The alternative seems to be feeling as though you are using survivors as battering rams against barriers in justice. Where does the balance need to be in terms of funding one-to-one support services and funding projects that are aimed at prevention or evidence gathering for policy changes? What needs to change in order for specialist services to feel more confident when their service users want to take the legal route?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
Emma Roddick
I will do them one after the other.