The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 613 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Emma Roddick
In the previous evidence session on the bill, I asked about victim impact statements and whether that would be the natural next step with regard to which crimes should be captured by such a provision. Do you have a view on that? I imagine that you come across lots of different crimes in relation to which it is suggested that the victim should be able to say their piece.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Emma Roddick
You have guessed my next question, because I was going to dig into the definition a little bit more.
What are your views on what happens if the aggravation is applied but the dog that is stolen does not fall within that specific definition although the person who is stealing it believes that it does?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Emma Roddick
On the changes relating to XL bullies, but also more widely, how strong is the relationship between more dangerous dogs, or difficult-to-control dogs, and dog theft in Scotland?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Emma Roddick
Finally, at the same evidence session, we discussed the possibility that aggravation could be justified because it is expensive and difficult to train guide dogs in particular, but there was then a bit of discussion about how that also applies to various working dogs, such as sheepdogs. Do you think that there would be justification for an aggravation in other cases where a dog has been trained to carry out a specific task for the owner?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Emma Roddick
I will move to questions on victim impact statements. You will appreciate that the committee has heard some conflicting views in the evidence that has been presented. What are your views in general on the idea that, in any case, the victim of a dog theft would be able to make a victim impact statement?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Emma Roddick
Good morning to both of our witnesses. I am glad to see you here today, Mr Wilson. As I was listening to your answer to Ms Tweed, I was wondering what work is going on around the licensing options that you are looking into in relation to dog control and whether any of that might act as a deterrent or as a way of spotting and tracking dog theft.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Emma Roddick
My next question is about aggravations. The committee has been told that there are no recorded cases of the theft of an assistance dog. What are your views on section 2 of the bill, which introduces the aggravation for such a theft?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Emma Roddick
I imagine that it is easy to come up against those conflicts when a body has other aims and strategies that it is working towards, which may not align with those of the national parks. What are the most common conflicts?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Emma Roddick
Yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Emma Roddick
Does anyone have any views on whether there are further opportunities for public bodies to be more involved in the national park plan creation process or to align themselves more closely with it?