The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1386 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Siobhian Brown
As I said, we know that the proposal for a specific offence of dog theft has been questioned by the Law Society of Scotland and other representatives. The common law offence of theft already covers pet theft, so it has been argued that there are existing laws in place; I mentioned that in response to an earlier question.
I do not know whether Jim Wilson wants to add anything.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Siobhian Brown
I agree. I am a dog owner, and if someone took my dog I would go straight to the police—that is instinctively what I would do. I appreciate your points that highlight the issue.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Siobhian Brown
As Mr Wilson said in response to one of the earlier questions, we have not seen any strong evidence that the bill will be a deterrent, but we must look at the bigger picture. As you will appreciate, my portfolio covers dangerous dogs and Mr Fairlie’s covers animal welfare, so there is a bit of a split there, but we have been working together and looking at responsible dog ownership and raising awareness through stakeholders. If the bill proceeds, it could raise more awareness. At this stage, though, there is no strong evidence that it will be a deterrent.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Siobhian Brown
Yes, and that has been raised with the cabinet secretary in relation to the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill. I believe that the Criminal Justice Committee completed stage 2 of that bill just before the Easter recess. Jamie Greene lodged amendments in that regard, and the cabinet secretary has agreed to work with him on the matter. I think that it was said that the process will be quite slow and staggered, but that is a matter for the cabinet secretary, because she is working on the matter of victim impact statements with Jamie Greene.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Siobhian Brown
As I said, it is a very emotive issue for anyone who has a pet, whether it is a dog or any other pet. Having been in my role and had this portfolio for two years, and having extensively gone through dog legislation and the XL bully situation, I am acutely aware of how emotive dog theft and having to go through things that have happened in the past couple of years has been for families with dogs. So, yes, we consider and take cognisance of the impact.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Siobhian Brown
Yes. Everything is under consideration. We will not say no.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Siobhian Brown
The Scottish Government notes that the bill would make the theft of an assistance dog an aggravated offence. As a result, the court would be required to consider whether the sentence given should be enhanced to reflect the significance of taking an assistance dog. That is one of the issues that the committee will be required to carefully consider as the bill is scrutinised. I note from Mr Golden’s letter to the committee of 18 April that he had engaged with stakeholders such as Guide Dogs Forfar, the Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and Dogs Trust to inform the proposal.
I would like to know more from Maurice Golden about the evidence base to support and justify the position that the emotional impact on victims is not sufficiently considered during sentencing under current law. In the committee’s evidence-taking session on 26 March, the representatives from Police Scotland and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service highlighted that the police
“would have to be able to demonstrate that the accused knew that the dog was an assistance dog to be able to prove the aggravation.”
At the same evidence session, Stuart Munro from the Law Society of Scotland was also clear that
“the sentencing process is already structured in a way that should allow”
information about the impact of the theft of an assistance dog
“to be properly taken into account.”—[Official Report, Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, 26 March 2025; c 20-21.]
If somebody actively seeks to steal an assistance dog, our existing law already reflects that as being worthy of a more serious penalty. We are interested in hearing Mr Golden’s views on that when you take evidence from him.
I will bring in Mr Wilson.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Siobhian Brown
Yes—my personal opinion at this stage is that it is a bit over the top, unless there is a justification from Mr Golden that would change my view.
Mr Wilson, do you have any further views on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Siobhian Brown
We would be keen to hear from Mr Golden about his reasoning in that regard and how he would envisage those provisions moving forward. As I said at the beginning of the session, we are taking a neutral stance on the bill and we will be keen to see the committee’s stage 1 report. Nevertheless, as the Scottish Government, we have to ensure, as the process moves forward and that the bill is legislatively competent, so that it can be enacted, and I will be looking at that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Siobhian Brown
Absolutely.