The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 888 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Jackie Dunbar
I am sorry; I am not used to online committee meetings.
The climate change adaptation policies in NPF4 place emphasis on flood risk and the application of nature-based solutions. Where I live, we have a couple of sustainable urban drainage systems and they are totally different from one another. How well is Scotland currently doing in terms of the uptake of SUDS? Do you think there should be standards and best practices that must be applied to ensure that these deliver maximum benefits?
12:00Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Jackie Dunbar
My question is more for clarification than anything else, if you do not mind. Based on the questioning that we have heard today, I am a little worried that there might be some confusion about who would be responsible for paying the levy. Could I get clarification from the minister on that? My understanding is that the occupier of the premises would be liable for it. I am aware that some companies currently charge for spaces. Is that any different to what is being proposed? I do not know whether I have made the situation any easier or simpler.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Jackie Dunbar
I put the same questions to Paul White. I am interested to hear your take on things.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Jackie Dunbar
I cannot see whether Caroline Brown or Chiquita Elvin would like to come in with any final thoughts. If not, I am happy to pass back to you, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Jackie Dunbar
I will ask the panel a couple of different questions. It is fair to say that everybody believes that our greenfield sites should not be used if at all possible and we should be using brownfield sites whenever we can. How could NPF4 policies on vacant and derelict land be strengthened to reduce the pressure on our greenfield sites?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Jackie Dunbar
Heather鈥檚 sound was very soft, but I think that I got most of that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Jackie Dunbar
I think that my questions are for David Hunter and Paul White, but I would be happy to hear the thoughts of Chiquita Elvin and Caroline Brown, if she joins us again. Do the policies that are set out in the draft NPF4 give sufficient consideration to the travel and accessibility needs of all disabled people and people with mobility issues? If not, what would you like to see in the NPF4, and what would you change?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Jackie Dunbar
Do we need some regional frameworks, or should it all be national? Some regions might have different needs from others.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Jackie Dunbar
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Jackie Dunbar
I will go back to an earlier question about the Scottish Government鈥檚 offshore wind policy statement, so that I can get more clarity. Some witnesses agreed that changes need to be made to align NPF4 with the OWPS, but they did not say what those changes should be. I would like to dig down into that a little more. I cannot remember who said that changes need to be made, but I ask Morag Watson for her comments first.