The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 888 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Jackie Dunbar
At the meeting that we held, great concerns were raised.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Jackie Dunbar
I will leave it there, because I do not think that we will agree.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Jackie Dunbar
How do we compensate teachers for doing that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Jackie Dunbar
Representatives of speaker communities have expressed concern that the duties that are set out in the bill on relevant public authorities to
“have regard to the desirability”
of taking action in respect of Gaelic language and culture are not strong enough, and that the reference to “desirability” could suggest that taking action to promote, facilitate or support Gaelic might not be desirable. Amendment 34 therefore removes the reference to “desirability”. A duty to “have regard to” taking such action will be clear for public authorities while addressing stakeholder concerns.
Ross Greer’s amendment 33 seeks to achieve the same aim, but it imposes a more complex two-stage test that might be less clear for public authorities that are seeking to comply with the duties. Therefore, I hope that members will support amendment 34 in preference to Mr Greer’s amendment.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jackie Dunbar
My question is about the independence of the review. Has the SQA report been reviewed by an independent person? If so, who?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jackie Dunbar
The care-experienced young folk also told the committee that they feel that there is a lack of support for those who seem to be making good progress. Once they leave care, they are left to it. How can we address that, both in the short term and as the reforms progress?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jackie Dunbar
It is just a lack of staff.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jackie Dunbar
Good morning. CELCIS research has identified areas for national collaboration. Can you tell me a bit more about those areas and how you think they can be taken forward?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jackie Dunbar
Is your priority to ensure that our children and young folk are better supported?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jackie Dunbar
I have a couple of questions about the care-experienced young people we spoke to. They told the committee that they often do not manage to keep the same social worker, and that that has a negative impact on their care journeys. What is being done to ensure that as few care-experienced young folk as possible are impacted by that lack of continuity?
Ben, you are smiling at me, so I will go to you first.